ABSTRACT
Abstract Objective: To evaluate the perception of rheumatologists regarding the recommendations of the Brazilian Consensus for detection of Autoantibodies (BCA) on HEp-2 Cells by Indirect Immunofluorescence assay (IFA) and how BCA recommendations help in clinical practice. Methodology: A structured questionnaire regarding the BCA recommendations for detection and interpretations of autoantibodies in HEp-2 cells was applied to randomly selected rheumatologists. The results were tabulated using the Microsoft® Excel program, expressed as a simple percentage and the dichotomous data were analyzed using the Chi-square test and the Epi Info® program. Results: Four hundred fuorteen rheumatologists participated in the study: 70% of them considered their knowledge of the HEp-2 IFA test satisfactory or excellent, and 43% said they knew the BCA recommendations in general, without distinguishing the edition of the BCA to which they refer. The Revista Brasileira de Rheumatologia/ Advances in Rheumatology was the means of dissemination most consulted by specialists (50%). According to the rheumatologists' opinion, the most relevant pattern was the homogeneous nuclear (78%) and 65% stated they were satisfied with the BCA recommendations at a level of satisfaction greater than or equal to 80%. There was no significant difference in the perception of rheumatologists from the several Brazilian geographic regions. Conclusion: Brazilian rheumatologists are aware of the BCA guidelines and most are satisfied with the content published, considering that the BCA recommendations assist positively in the clinical practice. Most rheumatologists recognize the patterns associated with rheumatic autoimmune diseases and have used BCA recommendations to interpret the results of the HEp-2 IFA test.
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Objective: to correlate clinical and epidemiological data with the pathological analysis of liver explants from patients undergoing liver transplantation for hetapocarcinoma in the UNICAMP HC and to verify whether the MELD and MELD-Na scores are reliable factors to predict a worse post-transplant prognosis. Methods: we studied liver transplants carried out between May 2010 and November 2017. After excluding 38 patients, we included 87, analyzing clinical and laboratory data for correlation with the outcome Microvascular Invasion (MVI). Subsequently, we computed the MELD and MELD-Na scores and performed a descriptive analysis of clinical and laboratory data and, finally, calculated ROC curves to assess the association between these laboratory parameters and mortality in these patients. Results: most patients were male (78.30%), with an average age of 58.53 years. Most liver diseases were caused by HCV (53.26%). We found no predictors for MVI among the laboratory parameters. The ROC curves for death identified the MELD score as the cutoff point with the highest combined sensitivity (90.91%) and specificity (37.50%), with a value of 10 points, whereas in the MELD-Na the cutoff point was 7 points, with a sensitivity of 90.91% and a specificity of 33.33%, both scores being significant. Conclusions: there were no reliable predictors of MVI between clinical, laboratory, and epidemiological variables. The MELD-Na score is more sensitive than the MELD one for predicting mortality in patients undergoing liver transplantation.
RESUMO Objetivo: correlacionar dados clínicos e epidemiológicos com a análise patológica dos explantes hepáticos dos pacientes submetidos ao transplante hepático por hetapocarcinoma no HC da UNICAMP e verificar se os scores MELD e MELD-Na apresentam diferenças estatísticas para predizer pior prognóstico pós-transplante. Métodos: considerando os transplantes hepáticos ocorridos entre maio/2010 e novembro/2017, após excluir 38, 87 pacientes foram incluídos, analisando-se dados clínicos e laboratoriais desses pacientes para verificar se há independência entre esses e desfecho Invasão Microvascular (IMV). Posteriormente, realizou-se o cálculo do MELD e MELD-Na, a análise descritiva dos dados clínicos e laboratoriais e, por fim, curvas ROC para avaliar a associação entre esses parâmetros laboratoriais e o desfecho óbito nestes pacientes. Resultados: a maior parte dos pacientes foi do sexo masculino (78,30%), com idade, em média, de 58,53 anos. A maior parte das hepatopatias foi causada pelo VHC (53,26%). Não foi encontrado preditores para o desfecho IMV entre os parâmetros laboratoriais. As curvas ROC para o desfecho óbito identificaram o score MELD como ponto de corte de maior sensibilidade (90,91%) e especificidade (37,50%) simultâneas com o valor de 10 pontos, ao passo que no MELD-Na o ponto de corte foi 7 pontos, com sensibilidade de 90,91% e especificidade de 33,33%, sendo ambas as escalas significativas. Conclusões: não foram encontrados preditores para IMV entre critérios clínicos, laboratoriais e epidemiológicos. O score MELD-Na é mais sensível que o MELD para predizer mortalidade nos pacientes submetidos a transplante hepático.